The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable sites offering both totally free casino-style video games and rewarding prizes, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of lots of gaming corporations, not to discuss claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments act as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue last year alone. Now the company deals with accusations of illegal gaming in a New york city suit that claims VGW uses star endorsers to 'develop a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's declaration below)

'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a range of stars from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any distinctions between traditional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely touts on social media

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements typically focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for actual gaming losses.

Others tempt clients with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement flaunting Drake's automobiles, aircrafts and estates before rotating to video footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever quit.'

The disparity between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps clients never buy,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social casinos offer clients a possibility to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency often referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, but can be utilized to open different features within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting consumers to get other currency known as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's automobiles, planes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all however seven states, which has actually assisted to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't require typically require identification. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to submit mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, players are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, therefore providing a reason to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for a possibility to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a kind of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to spend for an opportunity to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital distinction in between social sweeps and standard online sports betting sites like casinos.'

Think of the way that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that provide them the possibility to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself doesn't fulfill the definition of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all type of daily businesses in the United States, whatever from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently utilized by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For starters, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're typically not tied to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics frequently associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use" casino-like" payments, normally 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the typical payout portion for a momentary marketing sweepstakes is a minor share of the income earned by the company [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the web coffee shops that emerged in Florida, providing customers the opportunity to play casino-style video games for genuine rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually because been shuttered over allegations of prohibited gaming.

DJ Khaled is among a number of star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to deal with similar examination.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have repeatedly been cited by courts and state chief law officer as key factors in determining that a sweepstakes promotion was in fact a guise for unlawful gaming.'

Among the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact brand-new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are giving up considerable tax and earnings opportunities as this gaming replaces that performed through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the latest suit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal gambling business. '

Apple and Google have actually also been named as accuseds in claims for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for remark.

'We typically don't discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com by means of email. 'However, we note that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and remain positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, producing not only terrific games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise guaranteeing this is done safely, responsibly and at the highest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we mean to intensely safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns in between conventional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with traditional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues desire to forecast a strong stance against illegal gaming - specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting supposedly illegal sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise disregarded to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have an obligation to discuss to clients the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'A few of our worths are" our gamers come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious illegal gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at danger along with courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state lawyers general rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in prohibited gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton